日本问题研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 54-61.DOI: 10.14156/j.cnki.rbwtyj.2020.03.007

• 哲学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

朱子学“格物致知”立场对于《善的研究》之启发

耿子洁   

  1. 北京建筑大学 马克思主义学院,北京102616
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-16 出版日期:2020-06-25 发布日期:2020-06-25
  • 作者简介:耿子洁(1988—),女,河北保定人,哲学博士,讲师,主要从事中外哲学比较研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目“日本朱子学文献编纂与研究”(17ZDA012)

The Inspiration of Zhu Xi’s Standpoint of “the Investigation of Things and the Extension of Knowledge” to Research on GoodnessThe Inspiration of Zhu Xi‘s Standpoint of “the Investigation of Things and the Extension of Knowledge” to Research on Goodness

GENG Zi-Jie   

  1. School of Marxism, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Beijing,102616,China
  • Received:2019-12-16 Online:2020-06-25 Published:2020-06-25

摘要: 西田哲学如何继承宋学传统是一个宏大的论题,“格物致知”论是朱子建立自身理学体系的出发点,《善的研究》则确立了贯穿西田几多郎思想不同阶段的超越心物对峙框架的主客合一实在论立场。朱子学与阳明学皆以天道、人道合一为根本前提,但修学的入手处却分别在于“格物”与“致良知”两端。西田几多郎晚年日益重视现实历史世界的“物”的思想,这在《善的研究》阶段已初现端倪。虽然持主客合一的立场,但西田几多郎一直试图克服《善的研究》被误读为心理主义或意识主义的倾向,在认识论上强调抛弃自我的主观臆断而与事物的本性相一致。因此,至少就实在论而言,《善的研究》确立的纯粹经验立场更接近于朱子学的“格物致知”论。西田几多郎晚年面对质询亦援引朱熹的“格物”解释支撑自己对于现实历史世界的逻辑建构,保证其思想的客观真实性。

关键词: 格物致知, 日本, 西田几多郎, 《善的研究》, 主客合一

Abstract: How Nishida Kitaro’s philosophy inherited NeoConfucianism is a grand topic.In fact, the theory of “the investigation of things and the extension of knowledge” was the starting point of Zhu Xis establishment of his NeoConfucianism system, and Research on Goodness established the unity of subject and object that ran through the different stages of NisidaKidaro‘s thoughts. Both ZhuXi Study and YangMing Study took the unity of heaven and humanity as the basic premise, but the starting point of learning lay in the two ends of “investigating things” and “the rediscovery of conscience”. In Nishida Kitaro’s later years, he paid more and more attention to the thought of “things” in the real historical world, which had begun to appear in the stage of Research on Goodness. Although he held the position of the unity of subject and object, he had been trying to overcome the tendency that Research on Goodness was misunderstood as psychologism or consciousness. In epistemology, he emphasized abandoning the subjective assumption of self and being consistent with the nature of things.Therefore, at least in terms of realism, the pure experience position established in Research on Goodness is closer to the theory of “the investigation of things and the extension of knowledge” of ZhuXi Study. In his later years, he also cited Zhu Xi‘s “investigating things”explanation to support his logical construction of the real historical world and ensure the objective authenticity of his thoughts.

Key words: the investigation of things and the extension of knowledge, Japan, Nishida Kitaro, Research on Goodness, the subjectobject unity

中图分类号: