日本问题研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 37-43.DOI: 10.14156/j.cnki.rbwtyj.2017.02.005

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

日本功能性限定专利权利要求研究

毛映红   

  1. 山东大学 法学院,山东 济南 250100
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-06 修回日期:2017-05-24 出版日期:2007-04-25 发布日期:2007-04-25
  • 作者简介:毛映红(1971—),女,安徽含山人,博士,主要从事知识产权法的研究。

Research on Meansplusfunction Patent Claim of Japan

MAO Ying-hong   

  1. Law School, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250100,China
  • Received:2016-12-06 Revised:2017-05-24 Online:2007-04-25 Published:2007-04-25

摘要: 在专利权利要求中采用功能性记载,往往存在含义模糊、由字面意义确定的技术范围过大等问题,功能性记载的解释方法也成为各国专利授权、确权程序及侵权诉讼程序中的难点问题。日本自1994年特许法修改之后,包括机械等传统强调在权利要求中采用结构性记载的领域中,都出现了大量采用功能性记载的权利要求,并实际获得了授权。文章对日本功能性限定权利要求的记载要求和解释方法进行研究,试图为中国相关规则的完善提供参考。

关键词: 日本, 专利权利要求, 功能性记载, 解释方法

Abstract: Functional description in patent claims often has the problems of ambiguous meaning and overly large technical scope determined by literal meaning. The functional records have also become a difficult issue in national patent licensing, enforcement procedures and infringement proceedings. Since the revise of Japan patent law in 1994, which includes the machinery and other traditional fields emphasized on structural records, there are a large number claims of functional records and they are actually authorized. This paper studies the recording requirements and methods of interpretation of the Japanese functional limitations, so as to provide China reference to improve the relevant rules.

Key words: Japan, patent claim, functional description, explaining method

中图分类号: