日本问题研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 67-80.DOI: 10.14156/j.cnki.rbwtyj.2026.02.006

• 教育研究 • 上一篇    

日本高校创意写作教育:从实践形态、理念溯源到话语共建

邹茜   

  1. 武汉理工大学 外国语学院, 湖北 武汉 430079
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-25 发布日期:2026-05-08

Creative Writing Education in Japanese Universities: From Practice Patterns and Conceptual Roots to Discursive Co-construction

ZOU Qian   

  1. School of Foreign Languages, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, China
  • Received:2025-12-25 Published:2026-05-08

摘要: 创意写作作为西方现代学科范式,进入日本语境后呈现出鲜明的内生与转型特征。日本高校并未追求单一的学科化路径,而是将其嵌入既有文学传统与学科改革进程中,实现了外来方法(工作坊)与本土传统(文艺创作)的深度融合。在实践形态上,形成了审美内生型、跨界构想型与社会协同型三种模式,分别体现以“生活实践”为核心的审美传统、以“文化构想”为取向的创造力开发以及全球化语境下的开放式写作视野。这种渐进式本土化路径不仅揭示了日本模式的特征,也为非英语语境下创意写作教育的发展提供了比较视角。通过对中日创意写作教育发展路径与现实问题的比较,可以发现两国在协作机制、课程体系与学科评价等方面面临相似的挑战。中日高校可通过推进常态化实践协作、跨媒介课程建设与学术交流机制,探索协同发展路径,共同发掘东亚叙事美学资源,推动非英语语境下创意写作教育本土化范式的建构,促进东亚创意写作教育的话语共建与国际表达能力的提升。

关键词: 日本高校, 写作教育, 创意写作, 文艺创作, 话语共建

Abstract: Creative writing, as a modern Western disciplinary paradigm, exhibits distinct endogenous and transformative characteristics when adapted to the Japanese context. Japanese universities have not pursued a singular path of disciplinary specialization but instead integrated it into existing literary traditions and disciplinary reform processes, achieving a profound fusion of foreign methodologies(workshops)and indigenous traditions(literary and artistic creation). In practical terms, three modes have emerged: aesthetic endogenous, cross-disciplinary conceptualization, and social collaboration, respectively embodying an aesthetic tradition centered on “life practice”, creativity development oriented toward “cultural conceptualization”, and an open writing perspective within the globalized context. Such a gradual localization pathway not only shows the characteristics of the Japanese model, but also provides a comparative point of view for how creative writing can be developed in non-English contexts. Through a comparison of the developmental paths and practical challenges faced by creative writing education in China and Japan, similarities can be identified between the two countries in terms of collaborative mechanisms, curriculum systems, and disciplinary evaluation. Universities in China and Japan may explore pathways for coordinated development by promoting regular practical cooperation, cross-media curriculum development, and academic exchange mechanisms. By jointly exploring the aesthetic resources of East Asian narratives, they can advance the construction of localized paradigms for creative writing education in non-English contexts, and foster the discursive co-construction and the enhancement of international expressive capacity in East Asian creative writing education.

Key words: Japanese universities, writing education, creative writing, literary and artistic creation, discursive co-construction

中图分类号: