日本问题研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 54-63.DOI: 10.14156/j.cnki.rbwtyj.2016.05.008

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

《上海》——“保守”还是“前卫”

奚皓晖   

  1. 华东师范大学 中文系,上海 210000
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-12 修回日期:2017-02-08 出版日期:2016-10-25 发布日期:2016-10-25
  • 作者简介:奚皓晖(1986—),男,江苏常州人,华东师范大学中文系博士研究生,研究方向为日本思想文化。

Shanghai——“conservative” or “avant-garde”

XI Hao-Hui   

  1. Department of Chinese Language and Literature,East China Normal University,Shanghai,210000,China
  • Received:2015-12-12 Revised:2017-02-08 Online:2016-10-25 Published:2016-10-25

摘要: 横光利一1928年上海的跨界旅行,是透过经济资本在上海造成的地区性断裂来表达全球资本一元主义与平民主义知识分子"淳朴的自活"之间的紧张。作为革命理想主义的"芳秋兰"与价值虚无主义的"宫子"共同构成参木心态"表里一体"的一个圆。横光透过"参木"这个形象,流露出通过主动的虚无主义来回归日本传统伦理共同体这一激进的民粹主义意图。

关键词: 现代性, 《上海》, 横光利一

Abstract: In 1928,during Riichi Yokomitsu’s journey in Shanghai,the tension between monism of international capital and the “pure selfliving” of populist intellectuals was reflected through fractures around the district caused by economic capital.Fang Qiu Lan,symbolized for revolutionary idealism,and Gong Zi,represented for nihilism,coconstruct Can Mu’s externality and internality of his mentality.The figure of Can Mu is a reflection of Riichi Yokomitsu’s radical populism,with an intention to return the community of Japanese traditional ethics through an active nihilism.

Key words: Shanghai, Modernity, Riichi Yokomitsu

中图分类号: