日本问题研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 72-80.DOI: 10.14156/j.cnki.rbwtyj.2019.06.008

• 历史研究 • 上一篇    

近代日本宪法学派视域下的有贺长雄理论探析

李超   

  1. 复旦大学 日本研究中心,上海200433
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-23 出版日期:2019-12-25 发布日期:2019-12-25
  • 作者简介:李超(1985—),男,福建宁德人,法学博士,博士后,主要从事日本宪法史研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目“制宪权视角下象征天皇制与神权天皇制间的断裂与连续研究”(18CSS027)

Ariga Nagao's Constitutional Theory: the Perspective of Schools of Japanese Constitutional Jurisprudence

LI Chao   

  1. Center of Japanese Studies, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433,China
  • Received:2019-06-23 Online:2019-12-25 Published:2019-12-25

摘要: 有贺长雄是明治时代第一批宪法学者,他率先撰文质疑权威学者穗积八束的绝对主义君权说理论,两人关于明治宪法阐释的一场笔战被视为“天皇机关说”首次论争。为此,有贺长雄作为早期理论贡献者本应具备资格纳入“天皇机关说”学派,但通过深入考察两人的观点分歧和制宪主张,却发现其理论还是更接近“天皇主权说”学派。而且,有贺长雄在华担任所谓宪法顾问期间,不仅在中国受到民权派的指责,还被日本学界“天皇机关说”代表学者副岛义一撰文批驳,由此表明其理论与“天皇机关说”学派之间存在本质上的差异,另一方面又难以归入“天皇主权说”理论阵营,因此,在近代日本宪法学派视域下,其理论堪称别树一帜。

关键词: 有贺长雄, 天皇机关说, 宪法学派, 穗积八束, 副岛义一

Abstract: Ariga Nagao, one of the first imperial scholars in the Meiji era, challenged Hozumi Yatsuka's theory of absolute monarchy. Their debates on the interpretation of the Meiji Constitution were regarded as the first controversy of the “Mikado Organ Thought”. As a theoretical contributor at the early stage, Ariga Nagao should have have been eligible to be included in the “Mikado Organ Thought” camp. But his Constitutional conception which concentrated on administrative rights is closer to the “Mikado Sovereignty Thought”. With the transformation of constitutional system in the early twentieth century, the contradictions between his theory and “Mikado Organ Thought” camp become increasingly acute. His theory on the constitutional theory of china was under attack by the Soejima Giichi, the representative scholar of “Mikado Organ Thought”. All in all, his constitutional theory was in a peculiar predicament.

Key words: Ariga Nagao, The “Mikado Organ Thought”, schools of constitutional theory, Hozumi Yatsuka, Soejima Giichi

中图分类号: