日本问题研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 1-10.DOI: 10.14156/j.cnki.rbwtyj.2022.04.001

• 政治研究 •    下一篇

鸠山内阁时期“政治主导”改革失败原因探析 ——以委托代理理论为视角

张伯玉1,杨佳腾2   

  1. 1.中国社会科学院 日本研究所, 北京 100007;2.中国社会科学院大学 日本研究系, 四川 广元 628012
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-18 发布日期:2022-09-22
  • 作者简介:张伯玉,女,法学博士,中国社会科学院日本研究所研究员、博士生导师,主要从事日本政治研究。

An Analysis of the Reasons for the Failure of“Politically Led” Reform in the Hatoyama Cabinet ——From the Perspective of Principal-Agent Theory

CHEN You-jun,WANG Xing-ao   

  1. Institute of World Economy, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies, Shanghai, 200233, China
  • Received:2022-05-18 Published:2022-09-22

摘要: 2009年9月,鸠山由纪夫成为日本首相,组建鸠山内阁,实施了诸多政治主导改革措施,意图实现消除政府执政党二元体制、重塑政官关系的目的。基于委托代理理论,从选民-政治家和政治家-官僚双重委托代理关系出发,对鸠山内阁时期民主党政权的“政治主导”改革进行了全面分析。鸠山内阁时期的政治主导改革损害了选民、政治家、官僚三方利益,产生了委托人信任危机、加剧了委托代理关系中的代理懈怠,增加了代理损耗。从选民-政治家委托关系来看,由于选民对鸠山内阁产生信任危机,鸠山内阁支持率急速下降,间接导致民主党2012年众议院选举失利。从政治家-官僚委托代理关系来看,政治家一味抵触省厅官僚,导致官僚的消极怠工与暗中抵抗,加速了鸠山内阁总辞职步伐。因此,可以认为鸠山内阁时期“政治主导”改革虽然取得了一定成效,但从结果来看仍以失败告终。

关键词: 委托代理理论, 日本政治, 民主党政权, 政治主导, 政治决策

Abstract: During the Trump administration, through political, military and economic policy adjustments toward the US, Abe administration attempted to realize Abes personalized governing philosophy, hedge against the uncertainty of Trumps policies, and counterbalance the “security threats” from China and North Korea. Although both Japan and the US witnessed a change in leadership around 2021, the postAbe era will see a high degree of consensus between Japan and the US on the issue of counterbalancing China. Therefore, Kishida administration will basically continue the established course planned by the Abe administration, actively cooperating with the Biden administrations policy of counterbalancing China while further attempting to enhance Japans international political and economic status and strategic autonomy. As a result, the uncertainty of SinoJapanese relations will rise significantly in the future, and SinoJapanese relations may once again show a situation of “cold politics and cold economy”. In view of this, China needs to take active measures to properly handle its relations with Japan and the United States. coalition”. During the longterm independent ruling of the Liberal Democratic Party (1955 to 1993), the presidential election was conducted by faction. Factions were tools for presidential candidates to canvass votes or win the majority. It is an “abnormal state” for a nonfactional leader to serve as president—emergency temporary measures by the Liberal Democratic Party. Under the parallel electoral system of proportional representation in small electoral districts, the factional politics of the Liberal Democratic Party shows different characteristics from those under the electoral district system—the function of factions and their binding force are significantly weakened. Especially in the presidential election, the faction has been reduced from “the protagonist” to “a supporting role”. It has become a “new normal” for a nonfactional leader to become president, and a faction leader to become president is an anomaly. Regardless of the future development trend of LDP factional politics, its invariable logic is it is still governed by the rules of the invisible political game.

Key words: principalagent theory, Japanese politics, Democratic regime, political dominance, political decisionmaking

中图分类号: