日本问题研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 68-68.DOI: 10.14156/j.cnki.rbwtyj.2026.01.006

• 教育研究 • 上一篇    

日本新教育运动中的家庭教育及其转向——以鸠山春子的教育实践为中心

张泓明,崔雪燕   

  1. 山西大学 历史文化学院,山西 太原 030006
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-16 发布日期:2026-02-28

Family Education and Its Shift in the New Education Movement in Japan: Focusing on the Educational Practices of Haruko Hatoyama

ZHANG Hongming, CUI Xueyan   

  1. School of History and Culture, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030006, China
  • Received:2025-10-16 Published:2026-02-28

摘要: 日本大正时期兴起的新教育运动开始关注儿童的人格形成与个性发展,新中产阶层家庭由此逐步形成“以儿童为中心”的教育理念。然而昭和时期的国家主义兴起打断了这一发展进程,政府通过《国民学校令》《振兴家庭教育训令》等条例将家庭教育纳入“忠君爱国”的意识形态统治网络。笔者引入布迪厄文化资本理论与福柯规训权力理论来解释这一“转向”,即教育本身所具有的双重面向,既是促进个体发展的途径,也是实施规训的手段。自由主义新教育运动与国家主义意识形态操控间的角力鲜明展示了这一特性。

关键词: 新教育运动, 家庭教育, 文化资本, 规训权力, 鸠山春子

Abstract: During the Taisho period in Japan, the rise of the “New Education Movement” shifted the focus toward the formation of childrens personality and individual development. Consequently, families of the new middle class gradually established a “childcentered” educational philosophy. However, the ascent of nationalism during the Showa era interrupted this progression. Through ordinances such as the National School Order and the Instructions for Promoting Family Education, the government integrated family education into an ideological control network centered on “loyalty to the Emperor and patriotism.”The author introduces Bourdieus Theory of Cultural Capital and Foucaults Theory of Disciplinary Power to explain this “pivot”—namely, the dual nature of education: it serves both as a pathway for individual development and as a mechanism for discipline. The struggle between the liberal New Education Movement and the manipulation of nationalist ideology vividly demonstrates this characteristic.

Key words: New Education Movement, family education, cultural capital, disciplinary power, Haruko Hatoyama

中图分类号: