日本问题研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 13-28.DOI: 10.14156/j.cnki.rbwtyj.2026.01.002

• 经济研究 • 上一篇    

中日对东盟直接投资的竞合博弈逻辑与中国破局路径

马文秀,杨圣庆   

  1. 河北大学 日本研究所, 河北 保定 071002
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-13 发布日期:2026-02-28
  • 通讯作者: 国家社科基金社科学术社团学术研究项目“中日美在中国周边国家投资策略演变与影响力比较研究”(25SGC112)

The Competitive and Cooperative Game Logic of China-Japan Investment in ASEAN and Chinas Path to Breaking Through

MA Wenxiu, YANG Shengqing   

  1. Institute of Japanese Studies, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, China
  • Received:2025-11-13 Published:2026-02-28

摘要: 在大国竞逐东盟这一核心场域的地缘经济格局下,中日对东盟直接投资呈现深度非对称竞合博弈特征。日本依托历史深耕积淀的投资存量、高质量标准体系及“信任溢价”构筑核心优势,中国则以“一带一路”驱动的投资增量与基建能力形成后发优势。通过差异化序贯博弈、演化协调博弈与无限重复博弈模型的多维分析发现,日本在基础设施领域以“高质量”标准构建序贯博弈主导权;在制度规则领域借CPTPP提升规则内在价值、IPEF强化网络效应,依托演化协调博弈争夺风险优势;在新兴技术领域以“经济安全保障”战略操纵无限重复博弈核心参数。中国的破局之道不在于对称抗衡,而需践行非对称策略:从被动合规转向主动创标、从项目竞争升级为生态圈构建、以“耐心资本”夯实信任基础、探索有限务实合作,最终重塑博弈格局,强化中国在东盟投资的战略主动性与可持续性。

关键词: 中日对东盟直接投资, 竞合博弈, 博弈论, 非对称策略

Abstract: In the geoeconomic landscape where major powers compete for ASEAN as a core arena, direct investment by China and Japan in ASEAN exhibits deep-seated asymmetric competitive and cooperative game characteristics. Japan leverages its historically accumulated investment stock, high-quality standards system, and “trust premium” to build its core advantages, while China forms a late-mover advantage through investment growth driven by the “Belt and Road” and its infrastructure capabilities. Through multi-dimensional analysis of the models of differentiated sequential game, evolutionary coordination game, and infinitely repeated game, it is found that Japan builds its sequential game dominance in the infrastructure sector using “high-quality” standards; in the institutional and rule-making field, it enhances the intrinsic value of rules through the CPTPP and strengthens network effects through the IPEF, relying on evolutionary coordination game to compete for risk advantages; and in emerging technology fields, it manipulates the core parameters of the infinitely repeated game through an “economic security guarantee” strategy. Chinas solution lies not in symmetrical confrontation, but in implementing asymmetric strategies: shifting from passive compliance to proactive bid creation, upgrading from project competition to ecosystem building, solidifying the foundation of trust with “patient capital”, and exploring limited pragmatic cooperation, ultimately reshaping the game landscape and strengthening Chinas strategic initiative and sustainability in ASEAN investment.

Key words: direct investment by China and Japan in ASEAN, competitive and cooperative game, game theory, asymmetric strategies

中图分类号: